(Lead Member: The Mayor, Director: Melanie Corcoran)
Decision:
Resolved:
a)
That in respect of Project Marigold, the Combined
Authority approves that:
i)
The Project Marigold scheme progresses through
decision point 2 (Strategic Outline Case) and work commences on
activity 4 (Full Business Case).
ii)
An indicative approval of the Combined
Authority’s contribution of £5,000,000 is given. The
total scheme value is £100,000,000.
iii)
Future approvals are made in accordance with the
assurance pathway and approval route outlined in the submitted
report and where required any change requests are delegated to the
Business, Economy, and Innovation Committee. This will be subject
to the scheme remaining within the tolerances outlined in the
submitted report.
b)
That in respect of Bradford Interchange Resurfacing
Works, the Combined Authority approves that, subject to the
conditions set by PAT:
i)
The Bradford Interchange Resurfacing Works scheme
proceeds through decision point 4 (full business case) and work
commences on activity 5 (delivery).
ii)
Approval be given to the Combined Authority’s
contribution of £8,039,000, bringing to total to
£8,501,000. The total scheme value is
£8,501,000.
iii) Future approvals are made in accordance with the assurance pathway and approval route outlined in the submitted report and where required, any change requests are delegated to the Place, Regenerations and Housing Committee. This will be subject to the scheme remaining within the tolerances outlined in the submitted report.
Conditions
The following conditions have
been set by PAT to gain Approval to Proceed to Delivery:
a)
Confirmation of funding and total scheme cost is
within those set out in the FBC approval.
b)
Contract with delivery partner finalised and
evidenced.
c)
Confirmation whether an Asset Protection Agreement
from Network Rail is required and if so, what impact this has on
the programme.
d)
Supply of an up-to-date programme for
delivery.
e) Confirmation of project board set up and met.
Minutes:
The Combined Authority
considered a report on proposals for the progression of, and
funding for, two Combined Authority supported projects that had
been considered at stages 1, 2 or 3 of the Combined
Authority’s assurance process. The schemes being considered
for approval had come directly to the Combined Authority due to
expediency of delivery, and would be
reported to the relevant thematic Committee as appropriate.
The first project was commercially sensitive and under a strict
Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA), so was being referred to as Project
Marigold. A £5 million loan was proposed in order to
facilitate the outside investment of £100 million into a
manufacturing facility to be based in West Yorkshire,. Approval was sought to proceed through
the Strategic Outline Case, and for work to commence on the Full
Business Case. Local authority partners had indicated there would
be likely to an accommodation given regarding business rate relief
for a period of time, but the loan
sought from the Combined Authority would be on commercial terms
with appropriate safeguards.
The second project concerned repairs to Bradford Interchange
Station. Aspects of the station had deteriorated since its
construction in 1973 and approval was sought for the scheme to
proceed through decision point 4 (Full Business Case) to commence
the delivery of repairs, subject to conditions set by PAT (the
Programme Appraisal Team). It was noted that although the initial
amount sought for repairs had been £2 million and this had
received indicative approval as part of the Strategic Outline Case,
the total estimated scheme costs had since risen to
£8,501,000. Members questioned why the costs had risen;
officers advised that originally it had been believed that only
surface repairs needed to be undertaken, but investigative work
done as part of the preparation for these repairs had indicated
that further works were needed. There was also significant
contingency within the estimates.
Members were also updated on a
number of schemes which had been approved through delegation
since the previous meeting by the Finance, Resources and Corporate
Committee or the Place, Regeneration and Housing Committee. It was
noted that where applicable, outputs from these schemes would still
be recorded as part of the Housing and Regeneration Programme
within the Growth Deal up until March 2024,
and would also come into use at an appropriate time to count
toward the Mayor’s pledge of 5000 affordable and sustainable
new homes.
Resolved:
a)
That in respect of Project Marigold, the Combined
Authority approves that:
i)
The Project Marigold scheme progresses through
decision point 2 (Strategic Outline Case) and work commences on
activity 4 (Full Business Case).
ii)
An indicative approval of the Combined
Authority’s contribution of £5,000,000 is given. The
total scheme value is £100,000,000.
iii)
Future approvals are made in accordance with the
assurance pathway and approval route outlined in the submitted
report and where required any change requests are delegated to the
Business, Economy, and Innovation Committee. This will be subject
to the scheme remaining within the tolerances outlined in the
submitted report.
b)
That in respect of Bradford Interchange Resurfacing
Works, the Combined Authority approves that, subject to the
conditions set by PAT:
i)
The Bradford Interchange Resurfacing Works scheme
proceeds through decision point 4 (full business case) and work
commences on activity 5 (delivery).
ii)
Approval be given to the Combined Authority’s
contribution of £8,039,000, bringing to total to
£8,501,000. The total scheme value is
£8,501,000.
iii) Future approvals are made in accordance with the assurance pathway and approval route outlined in the submitted report and where required, any change requests are delegated to the Place, Regenerations and Housing Committee. This will be subject to the scheme remaining within the tolerances outlined in the submitted report.
Conditions
The following conditions have
been set by PAT to gain Approval to Proceed to Delivery:
a)
Confirmation of funding and total scheme cost is
within those set out in the FBC approval.
b)
Contract with delivery partner finalised and
evidenced.
c)
Confirmation whether an Asset Protection Agreement
from Network Rail is required and if so, what impact this has on
the programme.
d)
Supply of an up-to-date programme for
delivery.
e) Confirmation of project board set up and met.
Supporting documents: