The Committee considered a
report of the Director of Policy, Strategy & Communications on
strategic transport issues and their potential impact on the West
Yorkshire Combined Authority.
- The sale of West
Yorkshire bus operators (First and Arriva) and the Combined
Authority’s possible participation;
- The Transforming
Cities Fund submission.
- The potential impact
of the Blake-Jones Review, Williams Rail Review and Oakervee HS2 Review on the Combined
Authority;
The following were in
attendance for this item:
·
Councillor Kim Groves, Chair of the Transport
Committee
·
Ben Still, Managing Director
·
Dave Pearson, Director of Transport
Services
Questions and discussion
focused on the Combined Authority’s possible participation in
the sale of bus companies in West Yorkshire and the Committee
learned and concluded the following:
Influence over the current bus
network
- There is a serious
disproportion in that the Combined Authority spends around
£70 million a year (almost a fifth of its total spending) on
bus services but has very little control over the bus
network.
- The authority needs
some degree increased of control over services if it is to deliver
on its strategic objectives and promises, such increasing bus use,
budget efficiencies in subsidies and tackling climate
change.
- Consequently, it is
right that the Combined Authority is pursuing all legal and
feasible options – pending technical advice – and is
not counting anything out at this stage.
Details of the sale
- It is understood that
First has put up their entire UK operation for sale, but the
structure of the sale is not yet known. Possibilities include a
buyer purchasing the entire UK operation outright or smaller bids
for regional operations.
- Different regions
perform differently commercially. Ultimately, any buyer will seek
to maximise commercial value, which is bigger in urban areas than
in rural areas.
- First West Yorkshire
is largely profitable but there is a disparity across districts
where some urban areas, such as Leeds, are more profitable for the
company than other areas.
- If First sold the
West Yorkshire operation alone, it would likely attract many buyers
as it is currently profitable. However, if it opted to sell the
West Yorkshire operation together with neighbouring regions, it
might generate less interest.
- It was felt that the
large pension deficit liability might be one of the possible
factors behind the First company being put up for sale and that
this must be taken into account by any buyer or participant in the
sale.
- First is a large
local employer and any implications for employees must be taken
into account regardless of what happens next.
- It is also understood
that First plan to streamline their operations in the run up to the
sale and conversations between First and the Combined Authority on
how this will affect passengers are ongoing.
Legal and technical
advice
- Legally speaking, the
Bus Services Act 2017 says a combined authority cannot form a
company itself, or with others, to operate buses. However, the Act
is silent on whether a combined authority can purchase shares in a
company that might run bus services.
- The Combined
Authority has contracted a consultant to seek advice and understand
the full breadth of options available to it, what the authority
legally can and can't do, and determining as far as possible the
profile, structure, assets and liabilities of the First company
– including pensions.
- Scrutiny will be able
to see the report, strategic advice and the commercial, legal, and
operational information – possibly under exempt rules as any
conditions of Non-Disclosure Agreements are unknown at this
stage.
- Officers are also in
contact with colleagues at the Greater Manchester Combined
Authority who are currently working on possibly franchising bus
services in their area after a similar sale.
- Officers have also
agreed to share anything they learn with counterparts in
neighbouring areas such as York, North Yorkshire and South
Yorkshire. This was written into the consultation
commission.
- Once the bidding
stage begins, potential bidders, including the Combined Authority
if it chooses to do so, will gain access to the data room which
will provide far more detailed and comprehensive
information.
- Though,
non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) will likely also come into effect
at this time and must be managed carefully so scrutiny’s role
can be properly conducted.
Other options and
franchising
- Participation is not
limited to an outright purchase of the company. It could consist of
purchasing strategic assets such as the bus depots, which are
essential to managing bus services.
- In Greater
Manchester, Transport for Greater Manchester (TfGM) is considering
purchasing the bus depots and franchising the services.
- Franchising allows
the authority to choose services, routes and fares but the public
take on the revenue risk.
- According to the Bus
Services Act 2017k, only mayoral combined authorities can choose to
franchised services.
- For non-mayoral
combined authorities, the consent of the Secretary of State for
Transport is required.
- This would include a
new parliamentary order either granting specific permission to the
West Yorkshire Combined Authority, or all non-mayoral combined
authorities in future, to franchise services.
- The previous
Transport Secretary and departmental officials gave ‘positive
indications’ but the process of approval from the Secretary
of State is unclear and untested.
Systemic transport network
issues
- Hypothetically, if
the Combined Authority simply bought the company, it would be in
the same position as the previous company running bus services in
the current imperfect transport system.
- Like the issues in
Northern rail, the idea that public ownership or franchising of bus
services is a magic bullet should be dispelled.
- There is no cost-free
or quick solution to improving the bus network, including
Franchising. In any case, further public funding will be
needed.
- In Greater
Manchester, Phase 1 (reform) of the plan to franchise is expected
to require further spending to bring the existing bus network to a
level where Phase 2 (growth) can begin to be implemented and
benefits realised.
- There are numerous
challenges in all modes of transport, including bus, that needs
resolving with investment in infrastructure and
logistics.
- Regardless of who
owns or runs the bus companies, the issue of road traffic on
certain routes and in general must be tackled.
- One large element in
bus reliability is road traffic. Work has been ongoing for some
time on key bus route corridors to identify improvements in road
infrastructure to help buses shorten journeys and time spent in
traffic. Infrastructure improvements on a corridor-by-corridor
approach could be as transformative for West Yorkshire buses as any
change in ownership or control of services.
- The entire transport
network as a whole requires reform in a holistic approach –
bus, mass transit and rail.
Reliability of buses and other
modes of transport
- Based on feedback, it
was felt that reliability and affordability are the public’s
priorities. The current system is broken and buses are too
unreliable and expensive, especially if travelling on multiple
buses and companies on a route. Taxis are often cheaper and more
reliable.
- Despite the long-term
downward trend in people using buses since the 1980s, there is
still an optimism that bus patronage can be increased –
particularly by targeting young people.
- It was also argued
that it is necessary to increase patronage as without an increase
in public transport use, increased congestion will hinder growth in
urban areas and be detrimental to the environment and public
health.
- The Combined
Authority’s simple-rate daily ‘MyDay’ ticket concession aimed at young
people has led to a 55% increase in bus use in that
demographic.
- There is also other
best practice to learn from in the North, such as in Liverpool
where patronage has increased by 12% - though this requires further
study.
- It must also be
accepted as part of a wider strategic approach to the transport
network, that some communities – such as rural ones –
might not be best served by bus but by other modes of transport
such as rail and, potentially, mass transit – which the
region desperately lacks.
- While the Combined
Authority has long argued for a mass transit system in Leeds and
West Yorkshire, they do have an effect on bus services. Greater
Manchester has seen some issues of competition between tram and bus
services.
- There is still a
large disparity within West Yorkshire in terms of transport
infrastructure which limits some communities’ options. Many
areas are lacking clean buses which Leeds has in abundance and
other areas lack rail stations to access rail.
- A need for increased
reliability is something the public share with businesses and
employers. An affordable, reliable bus network gets people to work
on time, anywhere in the region.
- The possibility of
businesses and developers contributing to funding services should
be explored more closely.
- The Combined
Authority already has services, such as the Travel Plan team, that
market sustainable travel and bus passes to local companies that it
can build on in terms of business engagement and buy
in.
Resolved:
i)
That the report be
noted and the Committee's feedback and conclusions be considered
further.
ii)
That the Chair, Deputy Chair and Transport
spokesperson be kept updated on developments regarding the sale of
bus companies and be given a copy of the consultant’s report
and advice complete.
iii)
That a briefing note
exploring potential employer and developer contributions to bus
services be provided to scrutiny members.