Venue: Conference Room 1/2, Wellington House, 40-50 Wellington Street, Leeds, LS1 2DE
Contact: Scrutiny Unit, Legal & Governance Services
No. | Item |
---|---|
Apologies for absence To note apologies and confirm the quorum of 11 members is met.
Additional documents: Minutes: Apologies for absence was received from Councillors David Jones, Carol Thirkill, Peter Harrand and Betty Rhodes.
The meeting was confirmed as quorate, with 12 members present out of 11 needed for quorum. |
|
Declarations of Disclosable Pecuniary Interests Additional documents: Minutes: There were no declarations of disclosable pecuniary interests. |
|
Possible exclusion of the press and public Additional documents: Minutes: There were no items requiring the exclusion of the press and public. |
|
Minutes of the last meeting held on 18 November 2022 PDF 137 KB Additional documents: Minutes: Resolved: That the minutes of the meeting held on 18 November 2022 be approved. |
|
Chair's comments and update Additional documents: Minutes: The Chair welcomed the Committee and Officers and addressed his deputising as Chair for the meeting. He provided a brief overview of the two workshops held in December on staffing issues and the draft 2023/24 budget and thanked members who were able to attend.
Resolved: That the Chair’s verbal update be noted. |
|
Budget, Business Planning and Workforce 2023/24 PDF 220 KB Additional documents:
Minutes: The Committee received a report which provided the latest update on budget and business planning for 2023/24 and addressed comments and conclusions made at the Workforce Workshop held on 25 November 2022.
Discussion and questions centered around the following points:
Staffing, vacancies and business plans:
Integrated Corporate System (ICS) and financial information:
Budget setting process:
|
|
Assurance Framework Update PDF 124 KB Additional documents: Minutes: The Committee received a report which updated members and asked for feedback on the progress on the annual review of the Leeds City Region Local Framework.
The Assurance Framework must be reviewed annually by government, although the CA had not yet received the updated guidance. The Combined Authority must stick to government guidance and there were certain things that couldn’t be changed as they would not get approval on economic case for most projects particularly on transport projects for which government TAG guidelines must be used.
The main change in this year’s framework was the approach to evaluation because there was now an Evaluation Team in place at the Combined Authority to oversee that part of the process.
A peer review had been set up with other Mayoral Combined Authorities so that they can review each other’s frameworks and processes and learn from each other.
The Combined Authority found that the main frustration reported to officers reviewing the Assurance Framework was the amount of forms and work that promoters felt they needed to do to get through the process. Another issue was the requirement for committee approvals and the fact that committees often don’t meet regularly enough which caused approvals to be delayed. Some changes were made to lower risk projects, or projects with smaller funding, to allow for a more flexible and shorter approvals route to remedy this.
Resolved: That the report be noted, and the Committee’s feedback be considered further. |
|
Corporate Scrutiny Work Programme PDF 100 KB Additional documents: Minutes: The Committee considered the Work programme for 2022/23 and discussed the standing items, the accommodation project, cyber security, and integrated corporate systems. The Chair invited members to submit any further ideas or comments to the Scrutiny Team for consideration.
Resolved: That the appended work programme be noted and approved. |
|
Date of the next meeting - 10 March 2023 Additional documents: Minutes: Resolved: It was noted that the next committee meeting would be at the new time of 2.00 pm due to a clash with another committee meeting that morning. |